« VCs funding the social web | Home | MoveOn's broken record »
November 19, 2003
Why states shouldn't have VC funds
Good stuff from Tony Nash, formerly of Herring, now at Always On, in this piece called The State Line.Excerpt:
In the end, it's not the state's role to pick winners and losers through venture investment, it's to provide an infrastructure and environment in which entrepreneurship can flourish. This is the more equitable path, given our democratic system, and one less prone to unrealistic political expectations of big, fast returns. If a state wants to grant a subsidy to technology firms to promote fast job growth, let it do so. But venture investing should be left to those with a tolerance--even an affinity--for risk.
The CIA has a venture fund used to develop technologies which they believe could increase national security.
There are a number of companies in the bay area who have had CIA funding.
I don't think it's invalid as long as it's part of standard goverment procurement.
If you REALLY need a foo widget and there aren't any companies out there what's wrong with helping otu entrepreneurs?
Kevin