Socialism is no laughing matter
David Horowitz discusses Martin Amis' new book, "Koba the Dread: Laughter and the Twenty Million" and laments the "destructive romance of the intellectuals." A must read column. Excerpt:
Deutscher, Lenin, Trotsky and Marx all staked their claims on the belief that socialism would produce abundance and freedom. A terrible history has shown us irrefutably that it doesn’t. Socialism is really a theory of economic theft and what it produces is poverty. Socialist systems are unable to even keep pace with the technological development necessary to sustain a modern economy. Moreover, they are fundamentally incompatible with human liberty.None of these four revolutionaries still admired by the left had a clue about the critical importance of private property in making political liberty possible. Equally telling, none of them understood the necessity of a capitalist economy to technological progress or to economic well-being. In the last half of the 20th Century, vast masses of humanity -- hundreds of millions in fact -- were lifted out of subsistence poverty in those countries that protected and supported private property and free markets. This liberation of poor people into lives of relative dignity and modest luxury by capitalist economics represents a revolution unprecedented in the 5,000-year history of human societies.






















2 Comments
I have just read Koba the Dread in one evening! It's a very enjoyable, if odd, and stimulating book. One caveat, however: American readers who, a la Horowitz, expect to see Communism denounced for its economic illiberalism will be disappointed. Amis primarily criticizes Communism for its civic and political oppressions. As a good European leftist, unalligned politically except for a loose tendency to vote for Labor, he is set apart from the economic liberalism that constitutes such an important part of American conservatism. On the contrarcy, Amis--in so far as he thinks about these things at all--probably favors a good deal of government management of the economy.
I have one suggestion for you guys, the best way to understand socialism is to actually read lennin's and marx's works. the idea was wonderful and workable. the problem was that it went into hands of several idiots who misunderstood it. and crushed the sistem. reading somebodies book is not the way to understand it, neither right is comparing socialism to capitalism. "liberation of poor people" ? -you are wrong. it is not a right term. liberation of people to defeat the poverty was the main idea. unfortunately the poor were only people who really wanted it and liberated.