« Lomborg vindicated, environmental vindictiveness demonstrated | Home | Birds or people? »
January 7, 2004
NYT environmental bias
Despite showing some integrity for reporting the vindication of Lomborg, as well as the campaign against him (unlike the Washington Post), the NYT has clearly show bias by running this piece (Study Says Global Warming May Spark Mass Extinction) from the AP without so much as a faint whisper critical analysis.
what part of 'may spark' gave you the impression that the NYtimes is biased? check out the January, 2004 Nature report to find the whole answer for yourself on extinction and climate change.
also, do you know anything about the IPCC and its working process? If not, let me know and I can point you in the right direction about how this panel of scientists unlike any other in the history of science thinks global warming is human-induced and we need to do something about it.
NYT times covered the study but none of the criticism of it. No thanks on the IPCC.